-
Tags
blogging boring burnout challenges change Church growth Church Plant church planting communication communications Conferences Creative Leadership creativity culture design design thinking Difficult decisions discipleship Easter emotional health environment Funny Future Global Leadership Summit IDEO Innovation Leader Leaders leadership Leadeship Leading Leading change longevity managing Opportunites process social media Strengths Finder Swine Flu Tim Brown tough lessons transitions Twitter Unchurched vision
Category Archive: future
Subcategories: No categories
Becoming a Vital Church
There are very specific things that each and every local church must do if they expect to be around in the next 25 years. 25 years may seem like a random time frame. It’s not. That’s how long it takes for most churches to move from vital to declining (and soon to dead).
Honestly, most church leaders are not worried about what their church will look like in 25 years – they are just trying to figure out how to make things work for today. The good news is that these concepts apply to both today and tomorrow.
Let me begin by saying that I believe each and every local church has a mission to fulfill. No church is the “vermiform appendix” of the Body of Christ. No church had a purpose for existing in the past, but not one today.
Where that mindset exists, you have leaders who have missed what God is calling them to do and to be. I am not referring to the clergy when I use the term “leaders”, but rather the people who influence the direction the church is allowed to go.
Before this conversation begins, you need to ask yourself if you are actually open to doing whatever God may call you to do…or are you just hoping that God will bless what you choose to do.
Most North American churches are in the second category – and will soon be dead. What about you?
Finding Your Next Move
As several of you have noticed… the past series was more like an article than a post. My apologizes! So let’ s move to some shorter focused (and very practical) issues.
One question that I get is “how do we determine where to focus our attention?”
In the worlds of nonprofit and churches, that issues is usually it is driven by “who” more than “what”. “Who” is upset, “who” is giving money, “who” started the project, “who” will benefit from the project, etc. (is that supposed to be “whom”?)
In order to get beyond the “who” barrier, you must bring in some sort of unbiased assessment. This may be a person or an evaluation tool of some kind. Many consultants have the skills and resources to do both. ( I am not simply plugging 218Consulting…but I really do believe in what I do!) The outside consultant can see things that you haven’t, say things that you won’t, and do things that no one else can. It is, in my opinion, the best way to focus.
There are assessment tools that you can use without a consultant. For churches, I recommend Natural Church Development (NCD). This tool has a proven history in many churches across denominational and geographical lines. It measures effectiveness in 8 areas, and has a great amount of resources available to help you make progress in the areas you identify. I have used it in many churches, and seen very positive results.
Whatever you do – make your decisions wisely, not out of fear or pressure. What you do really matters, and is worth investing time and resources to do it well.
Formula For Change…part 4
The remaining elements for our formula are V and F. V is the actual casting of the Vision and F is the defined First Step. Pastor Joe is really good at preaching and connecting with people, so he is still trying to convince his board that now is the time to cast the Vision to the church. If you were on the church board – would you agree?
Imagine for a moment that you are in a city planning meeting and the speaker begins to address the issue of youth crime in your community. You have noticed over the past several months that the reports of crime have been getting closer to the neighborhood where you live. Your family is getting nervous about going out at night and you just had a neighbor get robbed. All of this plays in your head as the speaker spells out the depth of the problem and talks about other communities that have faced this exact issue. At this point you are engaged on both an emotional and intellectual level.
He proceeds to talk about how much better things are in a community that is very similar to yours – and says that the solution came when people in the community “got tired of living in fear and did something about it”. He goes on to describe what life is like for those families now and how great it would be have the same experience. The meeting ends.
He has just cast a compelling Vision for the future. Are you excited or frustrated?
Probably both. Excited to know that things can be different, but frustrated at not knowing exactly what to do. The other issue is that everyone is left to come up with their own idea of what ” got tired of living in fear and did something about it” means. Some may think community watch, some may think armed security guards, or a hundred other options. One thing is certain – there is no focused effort to follow.
Pastor Joe and the board need to lay out a series of steps that must take place in order for the church to launch the new service. From that series, they must select ONE very specific First Step that he will ask the church to take.
It must be clear and must involve action. Going home and “thinking and praying” about it do not qualify. Giving a financial gift, being a part of a focus group or study group, coming to a special information meeting all qualify because they involve action. People will think and pray about whether or not to take the step – so it accomplishes both.
So now that the F is defined, Pastor Joe can develop a Vision casting message that ends with a clear, specific, actionable First Step for the church.
The possibility that a new service will start at First Church is very high if the Formula for Change is taken seriously and in order.
Here it is; C iff (D)(V)(F) > S
Stated: Change will occur if and only if D times V times F is greater than S.
D = Dissatisfaction with identified issue
V = Vision of how that issue could be
F = First Step toward that Vision
S = Status Quo
Enjoy the changes!
StrengthsFinder in the Church
One of the topics that is receiving a lot of attention is how to effectively incorporate StrengthsFinder into the life of a local church. If you are not familiar with StrengthsFinder, you will be soon! Overall, I am seeing a significant trend toward the strengths based approach in both the church and not-for-profit areas. This is mirroring the action in the for-profit sectors. Companies and organizations have invested millions of dollars and hours into trying to get peak performance. Systems and processes have been refined to the Six Sigma standards – but that still hasn’t solved the key issue. Business and organizations are people interacting with people. If your people can’t deliver, neither can your Six Sigma system. In the church, the same concept applies.
You can have a great mission and model for ministry- but if you do not have the people in place that can deliver, then you are in trouble. StrengthsFinder is a great tool to help your key leaders get a better understanding of themselves, and where they best fit into your system. As a leader, you need to know your team and what they can or can’t do well.
Every time I give this talk in a church, someone quotes the scripture that His power is made perfect in our weakness (2Cor 12:9). That is true (of course), but the passage is about Paul asking God to take away his weakness (“thorn in the flesh”). God’s response is that this “thorn” is a reminder to Paul that even though Paul is a great man, he is still just a man and dependent upon God for true power. This line of thinking actually helps us get past the idea that trying to fix our weaknesses is the goal. The goal is to humbly understand that we all have strengths and weaknesses – but that we should focus on understanding both, and build on our strengths.
During this next week, I will be detailing specific ways that you can move your church or organization to an effective strengths based model.
If you are already on board with this idea, but would like to be coached through implementing these strategies, contact us about distance or on site coaching.
Leading into the Future
Personalities and Positions
As I have read and studied, one thing that I have noticed is that the opinions given about the future form of the Church seem to connect strongly to the personal leanings of the speaker/author of the given information.
George Barna, who has long been seen as a neutral voice on state of the Church, says in his book, Revolution, that the House Church will be the predominate form of church in the future. He warns the MegaChurches to get ready to sell their property and buildings (more or less). He also goes on to align himself personally with the House Church model, and the movement that has inspired it. His life experience impacts his vision for the Church of the future.
On the other end of the spectrum are leaders like Mark Driscoll. Mark is the Senior Pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle. He says in his book, Confessions, that the MegaChurch is just getting going and is the primary form of church in the future. His view is that the Church has really been a MegaChurch from the beginning, and quotes some scripture to back that idea up. He pastors a MegaChurch.
In all honesty, I’d be disappointed if either one of them took the opposing position. I am glad that they believe passionately in the form of the church where they have a personal connection.
Can you imagine what Mark’s church would say if he predicted the demise of the MegaChurch in the next 20 years?!
Read more about the TeraChurchProject, a collaborative wiki project on the future forms of the local church.
from TeraChurch.net
Over and over again, we find ourselves looking for clues as to what the future holds. We understand that with knowledge, we can be prepared, and possibly avoid disaster. The Church is no exception. One of the primary questions that Church leaders throughout our country are asking is…
“Why are we losing members?“
The response to this question almost always begins with “they should” referring to those who are not there. That is completely the wrong approach. The correct answer begins with “We should have” and ends with “so that is how we will move forward”.
With all of the information available to Churches today, there is no valid reason for having a dying church. Don’t misunderstand that point, I know there are plenty of excuses, and as a church consultant I have heard most of them.
The CANNOTs
“Our church cannot attract young families”
“Our church cannot compete with…”
“Our Pastor just cannot”
The WILL NOTs
Our church will not offer…
Our church will not encourage
Our church will not share a
Our church WILL NOT change!
Did any of those statements sound familiar?
They should.
These and other similar sentiments are at the very heart of why
the Church in America is in decline.
read TeraChurch in its entirety
Conforming to the Emergent Church
There is a great old joke about how all non-conformists dress alike. It is true though. That is the way that you can tell who they are! Even those who identify themselves as being different from everyone else have learned that you have to find ways to be identified by everyone else as different from everyone else. Otherwise, you are just part of the crowd – and no self respecting non-conformist would want that. But what does a non-conformist look like in a large crowd of non-conformists?
This is not just an exercise in mental gymnastics, but rather a question that I have after reading way to many blogs and articles on the Emergent Church.
I have written before about the concepts and focus of the Emergent (or Emerging) Church, so I won’t go into that again. The issue for me is that it is all getting very boring to listen to and read. I find the same mantras, same names, same everything all over the place. Conformity is winning over the non-conformists. What started out as a movement to understand what it means to effectively be the Church (and church) in our day and culture has turned into a very cohesive marketing machine. Go ahead – Google Emergent Church and Emerging Church. Write down the names connected to the movement. You will find a very small number of voices from the “movement”, but a lot of resources to buy.
In my work, I regularly hear about this new approach to church. It is categorized as either the “right way” to do it, or as “Satan himself”. Of course, neither extreme is correct. All of this really reminds me of early Methodism. John Wesley himself was concerned that the “movement” he was a part of – which was a pretty radical new way of doing church – would one day simply become another “form of Godliness”.
In Wesley’s day, information traveled slowly. It took a long time for new ideas to get out, and even longer for them to be adopted. Now, a new idea can be expressed, evaluated and adopted within days. With this time compression, movements can quickly become organizations that then become forms of what they once represented.
I guess what I am saying is that I believe the Scripture that says in 1 Cor 4:20 that the Kingdom of God is not one of talk but of power. And I am pretty sure that doesn’t mean marketing power.
update: I may have been in a bit of a cynical mood when I wrote this post. My apologies to the Emergents that are sincerely seeking and following God.
Community Impact – 101
So what does it take to truly impact a community?
Maybe the first question a leader should ask is “Why do we want to impact our community?” – or “Do we really want to impact our community?”.
Over the years I have seen leaders of various churches and organizations boldly proclaim that they are going to have a positive impact on their communities. The sentiment 
is seen as some sort of rallying cry to get the members on board with this new directional goal. Often times the reality of what this means goes undefined. Maybe that is intentional, maybe it’s just assumed people know, or maybe the reality is that those leading the new movement really don’t know what it means.
“Community” is a new buzzword. It brings up all kind of images in our minds. It can mean anything and everything from a small group of people who are friends to a neighborhood, or even to the idea of the global community. It is a word that is used to connect us to whatever feels good about the idea of ‘belonging”. So when leaders announce the plan to impact the community, we hear whatever we connect to. You may translate it to ” We are going to reach the people in your neighborhood and make them feel great about this church/organization that you support”. “Fantastic!” you think to yourself- “I want my neighbors to think highly about the church/organization that I belong to”. Unfortunately, 1000 others hear their own version of the message. Clarity is nowhere to be found.
First : Define it. The very first step is for the leadership to clearly define community for your organization. Is it a 3 mile radius from your church? Is it the county that you serve through your organization? Is it the world? Let people know what the target is.
Second: Describe it. What do you mean by “impact”? Are you trying to bring about change, or just offer assistance? Are you expecting people to be radically different or just more aware of what you do? What does the end result look like? Come up with a 30 second “word picture” that can describe the community after it has been impacted.
Third: Fund it. Unfunded mandates are the joke of most organizations. It screams “political move” to everyone who hears it. If you are serious, then find new funds or divert existing funds to make it happen. Give your people the resources that they will need to get the job done.
Finally: Do it! It is amazing how many times churches and organizations never get off the ground with new initiatives. You can make it through the first three steps and still fail if you never get the ball rolling. There are many people in leadership positions that enjoy getting the idea out there and sold – but do not have the ability to get it done. Make sure that the right people are empowered to make things happen!
Exerpt from "TeraChurch"
Christianity Today reports that less than 20% of Americans regularly attend what we consider the common local church.
According to church researcher and author Thom Rainer, in a 2002 survey of 1,100 churches, his researchers found that 6% of the churches were actually growing. He defines growth as increasing in attendance, AND increasing at a rate above the surrounding community’s population growth rate. “Stated inversely, 94% of our churches are losing ground in the communities they serve,” he says.
Christianity Today continues, “So what is the future of the American Church? Does declining attendance mean declining influence? If present trends continue, the percentage of the population that attends church in 2050 is estimated to be at almost half of 1990′s attendance had a drop from 20.4% to 11.7%. These projections for the years leading up to 2050 are less than encouraging. He estimates a drop to 16.6% in 2010, and 15.4% in 2020.”
So what is our response? Do we want to succeed or fail at our mission? Anything short of total commitment to turn this trend around will result in failure. We, as church leaders, are failing the millions out there who need Christ, and we are failing Christ.
So, lets commit to being successful.
Read more here
The End is Near! (again)
It seems like a regular occurance, an advertisement appears letting us know that the current “season” we are experiencing has ended, and the next one is beginning. From “Back to School” sales, to “Christmas Savings”, the items we buy have become the official signal.
A few weeks ago, a major heatwave was gripping our community. It was one of those times that you get excited about setting record highs – because it somehow seems useless to endure 103 degrees without some emotional payoff. On one of the hottest days, I needed something from a local home improvement store (for an indoor project, of course!). As came in the main entrance, I noticed that the lawn equipment was being marked down. That made sense – most people probably buy mowers the first month of summer. A few steps more and I saw what was taking the mowers old display area: Fireplaces. Unbelievable!
I asked the guy setting up the display – “Are you kidding me?”
“Nope” he answered. “Seems a bit early to me too.”
Obviously, this was not a locally made decision. My guess is that a corporate plan was laid out in the past couple of years that said: “Put out the fireplace displays on _____”.
In the rush to bring on the next thing, they seemed to be ignoring the obvious. They may want to sell fireplaces in the deep south during the month of August, but who wants to buy them? Not listening to your customers/clients/communities needs and offering what you think they need is just foolish.
Like this store, many organizations believe they know what is best for those they are trying to serve. And in some ways, they may be right. Unfortunately, the people they are wanting to serve will not come through the doors if they are not paying attention to their clients”felt” or “identified” needs.
Looking and listening in real time is just as important as setting out a 5 year strategic plan. Organizations that get caught up in the future can miss out on the opportunities that are in front of them. Regardless of your long term plan, which is a better way to make money- selling fireplaces or air conditioners in the middle of a heat wave?
UPDATE: As I sit here in September, sweating from the heat outside, I just returned from a trip to the same store. Christmas decorations are now for sale!